“How comfortable are you walking on ice?” the vestigial questionnaire asks. 1 – 10.
I mark 0.
On the way home from the wellness center, I begin to think
about a lot of people who are not comfortable on ice, or with ice, skating
thinly on it or around it, for one reason or another. This month and last, ice has been our chief weather,
fast turned metaphor, fast turning allegory.
This year, I’ve decided to read memoirs…looking, as I put it
yesterday to my uncle’s niece in Scotland, for clues to the way people persevere, for what
gives us the resilience (dare I say hope?) of brain and body to weather what
comes. Beginning with a published list,
then asking my reading friends for suggestions, then perusing the library shelves,
I came up with some I hadn’t known, as well as some already read…even a
long time before..and wanted to befriend again.
I’ve found a few important clues so far, two of which…maybe
three…I’m bringing to our book group Wednesday night to begin a discussion about
it (we were founded to have such discussions).
The first, found in re-reading one of the bravest books I
know, Maxine Hong Kingston’s Woman Warrior: a girlhood among ghosts, from
the ‘70s, opens wide the field for me:
“I learned to make my mind large,
as the universe is large, so that there is room for paradoxes,” she writes in an early chapter, “White Tigers”.
Yes, I thought…it’s a good ground rule for considering this
and a lot of life-searing searches, isn’t it?
Sure enough, it occurred as the resolution of a novel I
picked up on a whim between reading lives. Carys Davies’ Clear, set in
the Scottish clearances of the mid-1800’s on a far north island inhabited by only one
man, is a story of three lives intimately wrapped in estranged languages. (In
fairness, I won’t tell more, but urge you toward it in the spirit of
mind-enlarging.)
In between those books, I paged through Dinners with
Ruth, Nina Totenberg’s memoir on the power of friendships. While Kingston’s and Totenberg’s books (not
to mention Davies’) are planets apart in all the ways I can think of, Totenberg’s
friendships, both highly public and meaningfully, privately supportive, reminded
me mostly of the way in which most of our women’s lives work, whatever we are or do.
It’s at the end that she discovers what is behind resilience. Talking about the remarkable people (women and men) with whom she has “had
the fortune to have…as friends,” and are gone now, she wonders what they might
think of the current world they have left behind, the one each has worked so
hard to set right, to make better and more open to justice and sense:
“I am struck by the fact that no
matter their origins or paths in life, all of them shared a common trait: optimism. Today’s events, at home and abroad, would surely
test that optimism, but while I think each of them would be realistic about the
challenges we face, they would all be determined to persevere. As Ruth [Bader Ginsburg] often said, “My story
is hopeful.”
***********************************
I like my new vestigial therapist. My first homework, she tells me, is to stand between,
but not touch, the walls of a corner, feet together, while I close my eyes and
keep my balance for 30 seconds at a time.
(Not as easy as you think when you have only one ear working.) Then, in
the same corner, I am to open my eyes, look up, look down, look to one side,
then the other. And come back to center. Repeat.
Talk about a good metaphor for what perseverance,
resilience, and a widened view of life’s possibilities (and paradoxes) can give
us. Even if I can’t ever walk over ice, I
am coming to know the way to keep myself from traversing whatever landscape I do
come to, whatever dissonance or dark surrounds me. Hoping to get it right.